Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-15 17:12:18 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This article was retracted because "The participants of the survey [did not provide] written informed consent to participate in scholarly research or to have their responses published in a peer reviewed article." "The authors disagree with this retraction." https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-023-02635-1

Written by 69F2C835D90146F75BCD8639BD733BEA8D974092D5B50DCC365C9C04D535EBFD
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1669392399439626245
• noteId - 1669392399439626245
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 69F2C835D90146F75BCD8639BD733BEA8D974092D5B50DCC365C9C04D535EBFD Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1686849138493
• tweetId - 1669342383102742528
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• This article was retracted because "The participants of the survey [did not provide] written informed consent to participate in scholarly research or to have their responses published in a peer reviewed article." "The authors disagree with this retraction." https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10508-023-02635-1