Birdwatch Note
2023-06-14 08:22:08 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Durham Constabulary spent 3,200 hours investigating this event and concluded no rules were broken. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-62930023 The Privileges Committee investigates MPs who have broken the conduct rules of Parliament, for instance by lying in the Commons. There’s no suggestion Keir Starmer has done so.
Written by FF2507DE0C58FBEB1490804855C0225C4E97FC3DB5F835FCED25FA116F6C407A
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1668615792404094977
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1668896592437424129
- noteId - 1668896592437424129
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - FF2507DE0C58FBEB1490804855C0225C4E97FC3DB5F835FCED25FA116F6C407A Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1686730928893
- tweetId - 1668615792404094977
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Durham Constabulary spent 3,200 hours investigating this event and concluded no rules were broken. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-62930023 The Privileges Committee investigates MPs who have broken the conduct rules of Parliament, for instance by lying in the Commons. There’s no suggestion Keir Starmer has done so.
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-06-14 08:22:08 UTC (1686730928893) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-15 02:12:24 UTC (1686795144909) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-06-14 09:34:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-14 06:46:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-14 06:26:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-14 06:14:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-14 05:57:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-14 04:49:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-14 04:16:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-14 04:11:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-14 03:45:45 -0500 | Rating Details |