Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-13 09:01:26 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This tweet misses important context. The foetus was approximately 8 months old at the time it was murdered, and would have had the same chance of survival outside the womb as a full-term baby. https://www.nhs.uk/pregnancy/labour-and-birth/signs-of-labour/premature-labour-and-birth/

Written by 06A4139AEA50532D3DBD1A76C0B1803E955244BA9DDCBB9FF5206ADF62DA90D8
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1668249680193486849

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1668544091116785664
  • noteId - 1668544091116785664
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 06A4139AEA50532D3DBD1A76C0B1803E955244BA9DDCBB9FF5206ADF62DA90D8 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1686646886030
  • tweetId - 1668249680193486849
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • This tweet misses important context. The foetus was approximately 8 months old at the time it was murdered, and would have had the same chance of survival outside the womb as a full-term baby. https://www.nhs.uk/pregnancy/labour-and-birth/signs-of-labour/premature-labour-and-birth/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-06-13 09:01:26 UTC
(1686646886030)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-06-14 02:14:03 UTC
(1686708843603)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-06-13 18:47:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-13 18:40:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-13 12:53:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-13 11:31:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-13 11:18:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-13 10:31:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-13 10:30:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-13 10:17:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-13 09:35:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-13 08:47:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-13 07:56:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-13 07:48:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-13 07:33:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-13 07:11:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-13 06:33:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-13 05:59:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-13 05:42:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-13 04:34:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-13 04:30:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-13 04:30:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-14 17:46:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-14 17:42:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-14 16:34:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-14 16:34:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-14 14:59:09 -0500 Rating Details