Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-11 08:24:31 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The tweets claim that "Maddow suggests DOJ could do quid pro quo with Trump" is inaccurate. In the attached video in the tweet, her question was if it could be PART of a plea deal, replacing punishment for not running is not suggested. https://twitter.com/TVNewsNow/status/1667411871555547141?s=20

Written by 9CB2A511820CE49845967DE25FB59B3376524610C6EFA064E8AEA2AD45701EE0
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1667411871555547141

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1667810026575077378
  • noteId - 1667810026575077378
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 9CB2A511820CE49845967DE25FB59B3376524610C6EFA064E8AEA2AD45701EE0 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1686471871403
  • tweetId - 1667411871555547141
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The tweets claim that "Maddow suggests DOJ could do quid pro quo with Trump" is inaccurate. In the attached video in the tweet, her question was if it could be PART of a plea deal, replacing punishment for not running is not suggested. https://twitter.com/TVNewsNow/status/1667411871555547141?s=20

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-06-11 08:24:31 UTC
(1686471871403)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-06-12 02:13:19 UTC
(1686535999831)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-06-11 19:24:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-11 19:13:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-11 19:12:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-11 18:54:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-11 11:07:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-11 11:03:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-11 10:59:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-11 10:38:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-11 10:31:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-11 10:12:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-11 10:05:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-11 09:55:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-11 09:33:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-11 07:44:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-12 12:36:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-12 07:37:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-12 05:55:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-12 01:59:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-12 01:58:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-12 01:38:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-11 23:59:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-11 22:42:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-11 22:38:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-11 20:37:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-11 20:13:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-11 20:06:12 -0500 Rating Details