Birdwatch Note
2023-06-11 04:34:51 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Claims of breakthroughs in Earthquake prediction research have failed to withstand scrutiny. Extensive searches have failed to find reliable precursors. https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/131/3/425/2138719 "…specific earthquakes cannot be predicted." https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4873 https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/230/1/50/6522179 https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/ssa/bssa/article-abstract/3/4/187/115298/The-so-called-luminous-phenomena-of-earthquakes https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2012/may/30/attempts-predict-earthquakes-harm-good http://www.geo.mtu.edu/UPSeis/waves.html https://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/topics/animal_eqs.php https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-you-predict-earthquakes
Written by 2CDF1ED4C4FDB177F6A176724D1A281256C071DF34B115FFEB38C6CBC9C66850
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1667504138333179906
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1667752229015781376
- noteId - 1667752229015781376
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 2CDF1ED4C4FDB177F6A176724D1A281256C071DF34B115FFEB38C6CBC9C66850 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1686458091394
- tweetId - 1667504138333179906
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Claims of breakthroughs in Earthquake prediction research have failed to withstand scrutiny. Extensive searches have failed to find reliable precursors. https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/131/3/425/2138719 "…specific earthquakes cannot be predicted." https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4873 https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/230/1/50/6522179 https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/ssa/bssa/article-abstract/3/4/187/115298/The-so-called-luminous-phenomena-of-earthquakes https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2012/may/30/attempts-predict-earthquakes-harm-good http://www.geo.mtu.edu/UPSeis/waves.html https://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/topics/animal_eqs.php https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-you-predict-earthquakes
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-06-11 04:34:51 UTC (1686458091394) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-12 02:13:19 UTC (1686535999831) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-06-11 13:39:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-11 03:37:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-11 22:31:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-20 01:54:58 -0500 | Rating Details |