Birdwatch Note
2023-06-09 18:08:15 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Climate change is real and Human activity is the main cause: https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/ https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-why-scientists-think-100-of-global-warming-is-due-to-humans/ https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Headline_Statements.pdf https://skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-consensus-advanced.htm https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEb49cZYnsE https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_consensus_on_climate_change https://www.desmog.com/2022/11/30/heartland-institutes-survey-actually-supports-the-97-climate-science-consensus-its-trying-to-attack/ The Forbes article is opinion from an author who has an history of inaccurately downplaying real climate risks: https://climatefeedback.org/evaluation/article-by-michael-shellenberger-mixes-accurate-and-inaccurate-claims-in-support-of-a-misleading-and-overly-simplistic-argumentation-about-climate-change/ Moreover, it is about California, not Canada.
Written by 4E5743C652F3801F461FE559BEEE741F7F016098F206E963AA11A47F6BFE437F
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1665729870016442369
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1667232153220816917
- noteId - 1667232153220816917
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 4E5743C652F3801F461FE559BEEE741F7F016098F206E963AA11A47F6BFE437F Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1686334095662
- tweetId - 1665729870016442369
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Climate change is real and Human activity is the main cause: https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/ https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-why-scientists-think-100-of-global-warming-is-due-to-humans/ https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_Headline_Statements.pdf https://skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-consensus-advanced.htm https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEb49cZYnsE https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_consensus_on_climate_change https://www.desmog.com/2022/11/30/heartland-institutes-survey-actually-supports-the-97-climate-science-consensus-its-trying-to-attack/ The Forbes article is opinion from an author who has an history of inaccurately downplaying real climate risks: https://climatefeedback.org/evaluation/article-by-michael-shellenberger-mixes-accurate-and-inaccurate-claims-in-support-of-a-misleading-and-overly-simplistic-argumentation-about-climate-change/ Moreover, it is about California, not Canada.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-06-09 18:08:15 UTC (1686334095662) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-10 01:45:53 UTC (1686361553220) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-06-09 18:51:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 14:08:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 13:13:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-10 22:55:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-10 22:38:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-10 21:56:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-19 00:02:20 -0500 | Rating Details |