Birdwatch Note
2023-06-09 08:52:31 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This article quotes an anonymous source without any corroborating evidence. The Telegraph’s own editorial code of conduct states that “anonymous single source evidence should not generally be relied upon”: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/about-us/editorial-code-of-conduct/
Written by 79C636AF3FD70A9AD573AEE0F3D73C0D219F1391C47AC4C40C5890FA3006C45C
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1666909875224412160
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1667092295915536385
- noteId - 1667092295915536385
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 79C636AF3FD70A9AD573AEE0F3D73C0D219F1391C47AC4C40C5890FA3006C45C Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1686300751081
- tweetId - 1666909875224412160
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This article quotes an anonymous source without any corroborating evidence. The Telegraph’s own editorial code of conduct states that “anonymous single source evidence should not generally be relied upon”: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/about-us/editorial-code-of-conduct/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-06-09 08:52:31 UTC (1686300751081) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-10 01:45:53 UTC (1686361553220) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-06-09 11:41:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 11:27:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 11:23:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 11:19:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 11:11:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 11:10:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 10:45:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 10:17:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 09:53:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 09:52:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 09:45:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 09:41:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 09:34:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 09:34:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 09:34:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 09:28:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 09:26:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 09:25:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 09:18:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 09:10:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 08:28:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 08:15:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 06:56:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 06:32:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 05:58:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 05:18:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 04:41:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 04:39:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 04:23:30 -0500 | Rating Details |