Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-09 01:12:49 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Ainda que permitam uma experiência mais estética, esses tubos, principal mente quando reutilizados do modo como indicado na postagem, são mais vulneráveis à contaminação pelo manuseio e por concentrar resíduos de temperos que favorecem bactéria. https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/fsp/cotidian/ff0201200824.htm

Written by 609D279B137415762D5521499E4BA9B7A3D30095458885B24E72ED3B0F267AA7
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1666608347506679813

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1666976608916217857
  • noteId - 1666976608916217857
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 609D279B137415762D5521499E4BA9B7A3D30095458885B24E72ED3B0F267AA7 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1686273169150
  • tweetId - 1666608347506679813
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Ainda que permitam uma experiência mais estética, esses tubos, principal mente quando reutilizados do modo como indicado na postagem, são mais vulneráveis à contaminação pelo manuseio e por concentrar resíduos de temperos que favorecem bactéria. https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/fsp/cotidian/ff0201200824.htm

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-06-09 01:12:49 UTC
(1686273169150)		 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)		 2023-06-10 01:45:53 UTC
(1686361553220)		 NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-06-09 18:36:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-09 16:55:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-09 14:24:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-09 14:17:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-09 11:03:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-09 09:07:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-09 08:59:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-09 08:51:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-09 08:43:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-09 08:17:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-09 07:55:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-09 07:43:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-09 07:31:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-09 07:29:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-09 06:30:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-09 05:28:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-09 05:10:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-09 04:42:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-09 04:13:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-09 00:48:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-08 23:23:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-08 22:54:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-08 22:43:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-08 22:32:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-08 21:53:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-08 21:18:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-08 21:09:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-08 21:00:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-08 20:59:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-08 20:38:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-08 20:22:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-10 08:00:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-10 05:31:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-10 01:27:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-10 00:22:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-09 22:16:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-09 21:33:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-09 20:34:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-11 10:45:08 -0500 Rating Details