Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-08 00:58:49 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Details of Amber's SA were protected in a pre-trial motion. They could not be brought up by Depp unless Heard raised them, which her lawyers did during opening statements. Heard sought to bring in evidence of ED to explain why Depp "resorted to a bottle" https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-def-pos-confid-desig-7-1-2022.pdf https://www.justjared.com/2022/04/12/amber-heard-accuses-johnny-depp-of-sexual-assault-in-defamation-trials-opening-statements/ https://ew.com/celebrity/johnny-depp-amber-heard-court-docs-unsealed/ https://www.courthousenews.com/attorney-says-heard-was-raped-during-relationship-with-depp/ https://www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-news/johnny-depp-amber-heard-defamation-trial-rape-1335637/ https://www.theguardian.com/film/2020/apr/08/amber-heard-to-testify-in-johnny-depp-case-behind-closed-doors https://www.theguardian.com/film/2020/jul/15/amber-heard-antagoniser-rows-with-johnny-depp-court-told

Written by 08886B4EFFF363D81F6471376E7297DCD12293A31E19859B9338654371A9E7EF
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1666610700779659265
• noteId - 1666610700779659265
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 08886B4EFFF363D81F6471376E7297DCD12293A31E19859B9338654371A9E7EF Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1686185929854
• tweetId - 1666199048884482049
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• Details of Amber's SA were protected in a pre-trial motion. They could not be brought up by Depp unless Heard raised them, which her lawyers did during opening statements. Heard sought to bring in evidence of ED to explain why Depp "resorted to a bottle" https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-def-pos-confid-desig-7-1-2022.pdf https://www.justjared.com/2022/04/12/amber-heard-accuses-johnny-depp-of-sexual-assault-in-defamation-trials-opening-statements/ https://ew.com/celebrity/johnny-depp-amber-heard-court-docs-unsealed/ https://www.courthousenews.com/attorney-says-heard-was-raped-during-relationship-with-depp/ https://www.rollingstone.com/tv-movies/tv-movie-news/johnny-depp-amber-heard-defamation-trial-rape-1335637/ https://www.theguardian.com/film/2020/apr/08/amber-heard-to-testify-in-johnny-depp-case-behind-closed-doors https://www.theguardian.com/film/2020/jul/15/amber-heard-antagoniser-rows-with-johnny-depp-court-told