Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-07 23:34:37 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Johnny Depp's lawyers Camille Vasquez and Benjamin Chew have categorically denied that Mr Depp paid for any type of smear campaign against Amber Heard and that the court had dismissed any such suggestion. https://www.insider.com/johnny-depps-lawyers-paid-online-campaign-categorically-false-2022-6

Written by F4528DFC54355BD36C8A6440C263099CCCBABED8DF833FB099A5884A786D841F
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1644826442533064706

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1666589509776031747
  • noteId - 1666589509776031747
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - F4528DFC54355BD36C8A6440C263099CCCBABED8DF833FB099A5884A786D841F Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1686180877525
  • tweetId - 1644826442533064706
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Johnny Depp's lawyers Camille Vasquez and Benjamin Chew have categorically denied that Mr Depp paid for any type of smear campaign against Amber Heard and that the court had dismissed any such suggestion. https://www.insider.com/johnny-depps-lawyers-paid-online-campaign-categorically-false-2022-6

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-06-07 23:34:37 UTC
(1686180877525)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-06-08 02:08:54 UTC
(1686190134085)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-06-07 19:26:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 18:53:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 18:49:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 18:46:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 23:07:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 21:46:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 21:03:19 -0500 Rating Details