Birdwatch Note
2023-06-07 18:26:17 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. Yes it’s an engagement tactic. That’s the point. Wasteful use of CN
Written by 8409B4C36731E2CD6E22D9E9D6642D7C9C9F4A701C10F24F7CCAC5452253E843
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1665919884000108549
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1666511913831002112
- noteId - 1666511913831002112
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 8409B4C36731E2CD6E22D9E9D6642D7C9C9F4A701C10F24F7CCAC5452253E843 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1686162377209
- tweetId - 1665919884000108549
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 1
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN. Yes it’s an engagement tactic. That’s the point. Wasteful use of CN
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-06-07 18:26:17 UTC (1686162377209) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-08 02:08:54 UTC (1686190134085) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-06-07 15:47:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-07 13:31:38 -0500 | Rating Details |