Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-07 04:21:27 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

For the "Note-ist" claiming no note is needed as it's an opinion - Unless the tweet is satirical, opening with BREAKING is an attempt to position it as factual news. As no other media or experts have corroborated this claim, it is right for Community Notes to challenge it.

Written by F785CD69038AC7610D4E9F7A7FCAA9A7FEE501B4050AA19AA34AE33DE7D2CCC4
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1666141484603838465

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1666299305848885249
  • noteId - 1666299305848885249
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - F785CD69038AC7610D4E9F7A7FCAA9A7FEE501B4050AA19AA34AE33DE7D2CCC4 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1686111687516
  • tweetId - 1666141484603838465
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • For the "Note-ist" claiming no note is needed as it's an opinion - Unless the tweet is satirical, opening with BREAKING is an attempt to position it as factual news. As no other media or experts have corroborated this claim, it is right for Community Notes to challenge it.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-06-07 04:21:27 UTC
(1686111687516)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-06-08 02:08:54 UTC
(1686190134085)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-06-07 16:58:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 16:24:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 12:34:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 09:52:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 09:35:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 08:42:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 08:19:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 08:11:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 08:11:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 07:53:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 06:01:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 06:00:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 05:55:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 04:32:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 04:18:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 02:46:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 02:37:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 02:11:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 01:37:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 01:25:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 01:10:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 01:09:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 00:48:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 00:42:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 00:09:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-06 23:58:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-06 23:46:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-06 23:41:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-06 23:32:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-06 23:27:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-08 05:40:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-08 02:46:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-08 01:05:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-09 17:44:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-10 20:42:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-02 06:35:41 -0500 Rating Details