Birdwatch Note
2023-06-06 16:15:50 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The People's Republic of China does not have jurisdiction in CZ's and EEZ's in the Taiwan strait. Innocent passage also does not require consent from the PRC. While the US did not ratify UNCLOS, their FON actions are consistent with UNCLOS and customary international laws. https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/UNCLOS-TOC.htm https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Wild-Blue-Yonder/Article-Display/Article/2685294/us-china-international-law-disputes-in-the-south-china-sea/
Written by 49F493A20B3A4BD8068192A2C7DF09826B39A164373F61C8646C8A7D003CD800
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1665769244313673728
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1666116696749363201
- noteId - 1666116696749363201
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 49F493A20B3A4BD8068192A2C7DF09826B39A164373F61C8646C8A7D003CD800 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1686068150112
- tweetId - 1665769244313673728
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The People's Republic of China does not have jurisdiction in CZ's and EEZ's in the Taiwan strait. Innocent passage also does not require consent from the PRC. While the US did not ratify UNCLOS, their FON actions are consistent with UNCLOS and customary international laws. https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/UNCLOS-TOC.htm https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Wild-Blue-Yonder/Article-Display/Article/2685294/us-china-international-law-disputes-in-the-south-china-sea/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-06-06 16:15:50 UTC (1686068150112) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-07 02:40:34 UTC (1686105634600) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-06-06 19:03:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-06 17:35:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-06 13:41:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-06 13:08:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-06 12:41:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-06 12:17:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-06 12:14:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-06 11:41:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-06 11:40:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-06 11:36:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-07 09:56:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-07 09:11:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-07 08:17:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-07 08:13:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-07 07:48:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-07 07:45:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-07 07:36:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-07 07:35:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-07 07:02:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-07 06:37:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-07 06:31:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-07 03:39:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-09-15 14:55:56 -0500 | Rating Details |