Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-06 10:47:58 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

As provas contra Appio foram aprovadas pelo comitê de perícia da PF. O laudo contraditório vem de um perito contrarado pela defesa de Appio, não podendo ser considerado "neutro". Já o laudo acusatório vem da perícia da própria policia federal e encontrou uma nota +3 https://g1.globo.com/pr/parana/noticia/2023/06/05/pericia-apresentada-por-defesa-de-appio-questiona-laudo-usado-para-afastar-juiz-da-lava-jato.ghtml https://www.cnnbrasil.com.br/politica/como-e-feita-a-pericia-de-audio-que-resultou-em-afastamento-do-juiz-eduardo-appio/

Written by 7ECD1413F135E369B0124F734204DCF3BA15B1FA7AF516EA2142F04FD39C4790
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1665843518076596224

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1666034185931313153
  • noteId - 1666034185931313153
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 7ECD1413F135E369B0124F734204DCF3BA15B1FA7AF516EA2142F04FD39C4790 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1686048478001
  • tweetId - 1665843518076596224
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • As provas contra Appio foram aprovadas pelo comitê de perícia da PF. O laudo contraditório vem de um perito contrarado pela defesa de Appio, não podendo ser considerado "neutro". Já o laudo acusatório vem da perícia da própria policia federal e encontrou uma nota +3 https://g1.globo.com/pr/parana/noticia/2023/06/05/pericia-apresentada-por-defesa-de-appio-questiona-laudo-usado-para-afastar-juiz-da-lava-jato.ghtml https://www.cnnbrasil.com.br/politica/como-e-feita-a-pericia-de-audio-que-resultou-em-afastamento-do-juiz-eduardo-appio/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-06-06 10:47:58 UTC
(1686048478001)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-06-07 02:40:34 UTC
(1686105634600)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-06-06 19:13:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-06 18:45:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-06 18:08:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-06 17:49:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-06 14:48:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-06 12:25:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-06 12:09:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-06 11:16:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-06 11:14:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-06 07:17:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 07:25:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 06:52:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 05:09:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-07 05:09:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-06 20:48:00 -0500 Rating Details