Birdwatch Note
2023-06-06 10:47:58 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
As provas contra Appio foram aprovadas pelo comitê de perícia da PF. O laudo contraditório vem de um perito contrarado pela defesa de Appio, não podendo ser considerado "neutro". Já o laudo acusatório vem da perícia da própria policia federal e encontrou uma nota +3 https://g1.globo.com/pr/parana/noticia/2023/06/05/pericia-apresentada-por-defesa-de-appio-questiona-laudo-usado-para-afastar-juiz-da-lava-jato.ghtml https://www.cnnbrasil.com.br/politica/como-e-feita-a-pericia-de-audio-que-resultou-em-afastamento-do-juiz-eduardo-appio/
Written by 7ECD1413F135E369B0124F734204DCF3BA15B1FA7AF516EA2142F04FD39C4790
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1665843518076596224
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1666034185931313153
- noteId - 1666034185931313153
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 7ECD1413F135E369B0124F734204DCF3BA15B1FA7AF516EA2142F04FD39C4790 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1686048478001
- tweetId - 1665843518076596224
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- As provas contra Appio foram aprovadas pelo comitê de perícia da PF. O laudo contraditório vem de um perito contrarado pela defesa de Appio, não podendo ser considerado "neutro". Já o laudo acusatório vem da perícia da própria policia federal e encontrou uma nota +3 https://g1.globo.com/pr/parana/noticia/2023/06/05/pericia-apresentada-por-defesa-de-appio-questiona-laudo-usado-para-afastar-juiz-da-lava-jato.ghtml https://www.cnnbrasil.com.br/politica/como-e-feita-a-pericia-de-audio-que-resultou-em-afastamento-do-juiz-eduardo-appio/
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-06-06 10:47:58 UTC (1686048478001) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-07 02:40:34 UTC (1686105634600) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-06-06 19:13:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-06 18:45:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-06 18:08:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-06 17:49:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-06 14:48:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-06 12:25:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-06 12:09:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-06 11:16:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-06 11:14:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-06 07:17:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-07 07:25:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-07 06:52:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-07 05:09:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-07 05:09:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-06 20:48:00 -0500 | Rating Details |