Birdwatch Note
2023-06-04 21:04:31 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The tweet is not misleading, it is an opinion, and the Note doesn't even respond to the claims being made. You are proving the system can be gamed, which was his point. This Note is completely unnecessary yet because of majority rules was voted to be attached to the tweet.
Written by 2A623547AEA39EA1775D4C73A885C4B86DF27B9DD1E63FABE82BA40CAA37CF1A
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1665192931290914816
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1665464570389970944
- noteId - 1665464570389970944
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 2A623547AEA39EA1775D4C73A885C4B86DF27B9DD1E63FABE82BA40CAA37CF1A Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1685912671074
- tweetId - 1665192931290914816
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- The tweet is not misleading, it is an opinion, and the Note doesn't even respond to the claims being made. You are proving the system can be gamed, which was his point. This Note is completely unnecessary yet because of majority rules was voted to be attached to the tweet.
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-06-04 21:04:31 UTC (1685912671074) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-05 02:40:18 UTC (1685932818927) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-06-04 16:34:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-05 14:42:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-05 14:27:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-05 12:12:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-05 11:30:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-05 10:26:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-05 10:15:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-05 08:49:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-05 06:04:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-05 03:55:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-05 01:12:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-04 23:56:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-04 23:30:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-04 22:12:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-04 21:53:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-04 21:39:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-04 20:59:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-04 20:33:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-04 19:34:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-06 07:49:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-05 23:22:13 -0500 | Rating Details |