Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-04 19:13:30 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The given note does not support/rebut the OP. The note gives random "context" facts w/out sourcing that do not pertain to the content of OP. This is an example of what could go in replies but adds no value as Community Note. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples

Written by 39ECFEF45C04A0477E680415768C2BD3C9AAB802CC376FFBF1C1627240CEE990
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1665293950817562626

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1665436634072899584
  • noteId - 1665436634072899584
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 39ECFEF45C04A0477E680415768C2BD3C9AAB802CC376FFBF1C1627240CEE990 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1685906010537
  • tweetId - 1665293950817562626
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The given note does not support/rebut the OP. The note gives random "context" facts w/out sourcing that do not pertain to the content of OP. This is an example of what could go in replies but adds no value as Community Note. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-06-04 19:13:30 UTC
(1685906010537)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-06-05 02:40:18 UTC
(1685932818927)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-06-04 18:57:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 16:13:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 16:00:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 15:43:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 15:22:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 15:18:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 15:14:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 14:42:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 14:27:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 14:24:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 14:14:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-05 12:48:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-05 11:25:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-05 10:59:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-05 10:29:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-05 08:52:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-05 06:47:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-05 06:17:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-05 04:26:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-05 04:01:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-05 02:36:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-05 02:33:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-05 01:20:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-05 00:56:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-05 00:20:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-05 00:17:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 23:59:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 23:38:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 22:23:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 22:22:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 22:16:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 22:13:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 21:31:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 20:25:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 20:24:37 -0500 Rating Details