Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-06-04 08:05:28 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Congress does not have the authority to do these things. If they did, courts would quickly find them unconstitutional. See NYSRPA v Bruen and subsequent cases where similar laws did not survive scrutiny. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_State_Rifle_%26_Pistol_Association,_Inc._v._Bruen

Written by E46C45C88D3CB12C84C6000C8970047E8E521E1A93DAC4F7A286202566E1716D
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1664741177671729152

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1665268515803365376
  • noteId - 1665268515803365376
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - E46C45C88D3CB12C84C6000C8970047E8E521E1A93DAC4F7A286202566E1716D Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1685865928016
  • tweetId - 1664741177671729152
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Congress does not have the authority to do these things. If they did, courts would quickly find them unconstitutional. See NYSRPA v Bruen and subsequent cases where similar laws did not survive scrutiny. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_State_Rifle_%26_Pistol_Association,_Inc._v._Bruen

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-06-04 08:05:28 UTC
(1685865928016)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-06-05 02:40:18 UTC
(1685932818927)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-06-04 16:24:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 12:56:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 12:26:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 11:47:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 11:36:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 10:52:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 10:46:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 10:43:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 10:23:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 10:10:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 10:05:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 09:17:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 08:44:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 08:35:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 08:18:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 08:00:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 07:59:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 07:40:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 06:44:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 06:38:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 04:28:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 03:17:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-04 03:17:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-05 09:22:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-05 00:52:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-06 07:53:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-11 12:21:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-12 11:46:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-12 10:52:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-17 00:05:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 12:54:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-16 12:52:57 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-16 07:19:27 -0500 Rating Details