Birdwatch Note
2023-06-03 18:32:55 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The Citizens United majority opinion does not reference corporate personhood. It argues that First Amendment rights do not depend on the identity of the speaker, which could be a citizen or association of citizens. The decisions applies to other associations, such as unions. https://www.fec.gov/resources/legal-resources/litigation/cu_sc08_opinion.pdf
Written by D1ABC97F5A39D0CCEF834570E6A19D5933AF4BFFA87F0D37CE75D33B5A23E084
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1664769111778369537
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1665064031755948032
- noteId - 1665064031755948032
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - D1ABC97F5A39D0CCEF834570E6A19D5933AF4BFFA87F0D37CE75D33B5A23E084 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1685817175220
- tweetId - 1664769111778369537
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The Citizens United majority opinion does not reference corporate personhood. It argues that First Amendment rights do not depend on the identity of the speaker, which could be a citizen or association of citizens. The decisions applies to other associations, such as unions. https://www.fec.gov/resources/legal-resources/litigation/cu_sc08_opinion.pdf
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-06-03 18:32:55 UTC (1685817175220) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-04 02:42:06 UTC (1685846526778) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-06-03 17:45:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-03 17:40:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-03 16:30:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-03 16:24:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-03 16:05:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-03 15:35:05 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-03 14:50:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-03 14:30:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-03 14:27:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-03 14:22:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-03 14:10:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-03 14:08:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-03 13:49:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-03 13:49:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-04 15:32:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-04 12:08:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-04 09:03:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-04 08:05:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-04 01:55:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-03 21:17:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-03 21:03:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-05 03:13:16 -0500 | Rating Details |