Birdwatch Note
2023-06-02 13:07:03 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The Court's ruling was not a partisan decision, rather an 8-1 decision which was supported by multiple Democratic appointees, nor does it undermine the right to unions. It clarifies existing labor law, which forbids workers from destroying company property. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-1449_d9eh.pdf
Written by D2986B6BE6AFF95E6F9CB83DC1F272A3A7FC896E87FECF840D2BA8FB91A93F6C
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1664491690428887040
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1664619639089819649
- noteId - 1664619639089819649
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - D2986B6BE6AFF95E6F9CB83DC1F272A3A7FC896E87FECF840D2BA8FB91A93F6C Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1685711223755
- tweetId - 1664491690428887040
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The Court's ruling was not a partisan decision, rather an 8-1 decision which was supported by multiple Democratic appointees, nor does it undermine the right to unions. It clarifies existing labor law, which forbids workers from destroying company property. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-1449_d9eh.pdf
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-06-02 13:07:03 UTC (1685711223755) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-03 02:12:11 UTC (1685758331005) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-06-02 16:21:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-02 13:40:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-02 11:47:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-02 10:03:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-02 09:37:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-02 09:24:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-02 09:14:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-02 08:55:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-02 08:46:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-02 08:43:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-02 08:18:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-03 04:28:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-02 21:22:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-03 20:57:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-07 22:29:24 -0500 | Rating Details |