Birdwatch Note
2023-05-31 23:08:52 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The ruling for the plaintiff was unanimous, but there was a 5-4 split in opinions. Kavanaugh wrote an opinion, joined by the 3 Liberal justices, concerned that the ruling "would have significant repercussions for water quality and flood control throughout the United States." https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/25/us/supreme-court-epa-water-pollution.html
Written by 8DD1246A9B390B34CBDDCBDCEE2E8A9EF0C20DAB35605009C67D7CDB00B160F4
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1662081586974556161
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1664046314794135552
- noteId - 1664046314794135552
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 8DD1246A9B390B34CBDDCBDCEE2E8A9EF0C20DAB35605009C67D7CDB00B160F4 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1685574532590
- tweetId - 1662081586974556161
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The ruling for the plaintiff was unanimous, but there was a 5-4 split in opinions. Kavanaugh wrote an opinion, joined by the 3 Liberal justices, concerned that the ruling "would have significant repercussions for water quality and flood control throughout the United States." https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/25/us/supreme-court-epa-water-pollution.html
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-05-31 23:08:52 UTC (1685574532590) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-01 02:11:43 UTC (1685585503373) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-05-31 19:21:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-31 18:45:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-31 18:14:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-31 22:31:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-31 19:52:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-31 19:50:25 -0500 | Rating Details |