Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-05-31 10:16:09 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Stop abusing CN to promote your partisan narrative. There's nothing misleading with this tweet. Agree or not, it's a fact that SCOTUS overruled constitutional protections for abortion, and the OP is entitled to his opinion about it. Any disagreement belongs to the replies: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dobbs_v._Jackson_Women%27s_Health_Organization

Written by 4E5743C652F3801F461FE559BEEE741F7F016098F206E963AA11A47F6BFE437F
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1663851852146827264
• noteId - 1663851852146827264
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 4E5743C652F3801F461FE559BEEE741F7F016098F206E963AA11A47F6BFE437F Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1685528169082
• tweetId - 1663717657944682503
• classification - NOT_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• Stop abusing CN to promote your partisan narrative. There's nothing misleading with this tweet. Agree or not, it's a fact that SCOTUS overruled constitutional protections for abortion, and the OP is entitled to his opinion about it. Any disagreement belongs to the replies: https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/values https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dobbs_v._Jackson_Women%27s_Health_Organization