Birdwatch Note
2023-05-31 01:21:30 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Tweet is factually correct. “However, the conservative Texas Supreme Court blocked the county from doing so after it faced litigation from Paxton's office.” https://www.newsweek.com/texas-ag-says-trump-wouldve-lost-state-if-it-hadnt-blocked-mail-ballots-applications-being-1597909?amp=1
Written by 65BC470A4DEA21B2322BA97E9458FDB2AB5C6DBE974E2ACCC6A242F7BDF71F90
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1663590579232440333
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1663717305111519235
- noteId - 1663717305111519235
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 65BC470A4DEA21B2322BA97E9458FDB2AB5C6DBE974E2ACCC6A242F7BDF71F90 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1685496090569
- tweetId - 1663590579232440333
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Tweet is factually correct. “However, the conservative Texas Supreme Court blocked the county from doing so after it faced litigation from Paxton's office.” https://www.newsweek.com/texas-ag-says-trump-wouldve-lost-state-if-it-hadnt-blocked-mail-ballots-applications-being-1597909?amp=1
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-05-31 01:21:30 UTC (1685496090569) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-01 02:11:43 UTC (1685585503373) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-05-31 07:18:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-31 07:09:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-31 02:26:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-31 01:49:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-30 23:37:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-30 23:02:40 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-30 22:07:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-30 22:01:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-30 21:52:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-30 21:46:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-30 21:43:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-30 21:41:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-30 21:32:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-30 21:30:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-30 21:20:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-30 21:12:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-30 21:03:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-30 20:45:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-30 20:34:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-30 20:31:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-30 20:30:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-30 20:25:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-01 08:51:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-01 01:45:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-31 23:57:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-03 11:56:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-04 16:27:32 -0500 | Rating Details |