Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-05-29 21:07:13 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The “250,000 killed” amount has been disputed by more contemporary WW2 historians. Many, like the linked source, acknowledge that figure as the high end number of people killed, but suggest the actual number of deaths were around 25,000. https://www.britannica.com/event/bombing-of-Dresden

Written by 6BCF4D9D31836D8D547251B6FCB4AB490335FF1D235E32C1E556F1CEDE3EF756
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1663278750727847936

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1663290923495706630
  • noteId - 1663290923495706630
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 6BCF4D9D31836D8D547251B6FCB4AB490335FF1D235E32C1E556F1CEDE3EF756 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1685394433270
  • tweetId - 1663278750727847936
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The “250,000 killed” amount has been disputed by more contemporary WW2 historians. Many, like the linked source, acknowledge that figure as the high end number of people killed, but suggest the actual number of deaths were around 25,000. https://www.britannica.com/event/bombing-of-Dresden

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-05-29 21:07:13 UTC
(1685394433270)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-05-31 02:39:52 UTC
(1685500792003)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-05-30 16:13:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-30 15:03:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-30 12:42:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-30 12:01:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-30 11:58:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-30 08:47:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-30 08:03:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-30 07:11:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-30 06:58:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-30 05:24:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-30 04:50:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-30 02:48:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-30 01:44:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-30 01:06:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-30 00:56:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-30 00:16:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-30 00:10:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-30 00:08:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-30 00:06:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-29 23:37:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-29 23:36:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-29 22:10:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-29 21:52:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-29 20:44:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-29 20:16:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-29 20:16:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-29 19:48:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-29 18:49:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-29 18:42:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-29 18:07:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-29 17:59:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-29 17:56:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-29 17:01:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-29 16:45:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-29 16:13:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-31 10:55:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-31 04:51:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-30 23:49:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-30 19:33:09 -0500 Rating Details