Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-05-28 14:13:01 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The issue of paxlovid study being biased compared to the ivermectin study is factual. This blog presents the demographic tables of each and clearly paxlovid had more advantages. This does not mean both are effective but does show bias. http://covid19mathblog.com/2022/04/covid-4-1-22/

Written by 173B6860F741204659168040838C4F3E7295FF45EA47CC5F8A5B7593E8DF096D
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1662813309995819009

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1662824298527039490
  • noteId - 1662824298527039490
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 173B6860F741204659168040838C4F3E7295FF45EA47CC5F8A5B7593E8DF096D Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1685283181207
  • tweetId - 1662813309995819009
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The issue of paxlovid study being biased compared to the ivermectin study is factual. This blog presents the demographic tables of each and clearly paxlovid had more advantages. This does not mean both are effective but does show bias. http://covid19mathblog.com/2022/04/covid-4-1-22/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-05-28 14:13:01 UTC
(1685283181207)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-05-31 02:39:52 UTC
(1685500792003)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-05-29 06:00:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-29 01:10:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 22:55:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 19:02:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 18:49:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 16:16:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 15:54:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 15:51:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 15:50:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 15:31:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 15:20:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 15:18:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 15:18:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 15:05:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 14:52:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 14:30:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 14:28:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 14:20:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 14:14:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 13:58:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 12:55:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 11:50:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 11:21:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 10:27:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 10:17:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-03 15:48:18 -0500 Rating Details