Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-05-28 08:44:15 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

By including the Voice to Parliament into the Australian Constitution, the Voice by its own presence would have changed the Constitution, regardless of what powers it will be given. The details of how the Voice will operate will be decided at a later date by Parliament. https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/the-voice/2023/03/why-the-voice-amendment-is-unconstitutional/ https://www.cis.org.au/commentary/opinion/push-for-a-voice-to-parliament-is-a-bureaucratic-power-grab-to-give-indigenous-australians-rights-they-already-have/

Written by 049E9E249CF132BD220934A2301413303C9F83D5CC0D861A6488BB5A903CCA42
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1662309017363058688

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1662741564823851008
  • noteId - 1662741564823851008
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 049E9E249CF132BD220934A2301413303C9F83D5CC0D861A6488BB5A903CCA42 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1685263455955
  • tweetId - 1662309017363058688
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • By including the Voice to Parliament into the Australian Constitution, the Voice by its own presence would have changed the Constitution, regardless of what powers it will be given. The details of how the Voice will operate will be decided at a later date by Parliament. https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/the-voice/2023/03/why-the-voice-amendment-is-unconstitutional/ https://www.cis.org.au/commentary/opinion/push-for-a-voice-to-parliament-is-a-bureaucratic-power-grab-to-give-indigenous-australians-rights-they-already-have/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-05-28 08:44:15 UTC
(1685263455955)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-05-31 02:39:52 UTC
(1685500792003)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-05-29 02:23:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 22:26:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 22:09:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 18:11:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 16:01:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 15:39:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 14:04:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 13:59:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 07:28:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 06:30:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-28 03:56:35 -0500 Rating Details