Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-05-27 01:56:35 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

This tweet is controversial. There is nothing wrong with giving a rebuttal. The rebuttal should be done by reply to the thread. Doing a rebuttal as a community note is abuse of power and as such is inappropriate use of cn.

Written by F743EDB30FDD2C65CF5D4A3911F36779629F8E102EC20910696D4D6FDEDDAEEA
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1661839153384792066

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1662276584068505600
  • noteId - 1662276584068505600
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - F743EDB30FDD2C65CF5D4A3911F36779629F8E102EC20910696D4D6FDEDDAEEA Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1685152595904
  • tweetId - 1661839153384792066
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • This tweet is controversial. There is nothing wrong with giving a rebuttal. The rebuttal should be done by reply to the thread. Doing a rebuttal as a community note is abuse of power and as such is inappropriate use of cn.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-05-27 01:56:35 UTC
(1685152595904)
2023-05-27 21:11:18 UTC
(1685221878636)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-05-31 02:39:52 UTC
(1685500792003)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-05-27 21:11:18 UTC
(1685221878636)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-05-28 09:02:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-27 18:02:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-27 17:37:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-27 14:20:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-27 13:14:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-27 10:27:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-27 08:38:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-27 03:02:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-27 01:15:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-27 01:13:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-27 00:34:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-26 23:30:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-26 21:46:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-26 21:01:31 -0500 Rating Details