Birdwatch Note
2023-05-24 14:50:25 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The article is an opinion and that is clear in the tweet, NNN. https://t.co/QdU0fvgOj7
Written by 11FAEB4817D639E4726FC7F26B43264A47986DF6E8DEA57F5096AC2B6DA92C69
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1660254137689292800
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1661384160554958848
- noteId - 1661384160554958848
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 11FAEB4817D639E4726FC7F26B43264A47986DF6E8DEA57F5096AC2B6DA92C69 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1684939825558
- tweetId - 1660254137689292800
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The article is an opinion and that is clear in the tweet, NNN. https://t.co/QdU0fvgOj7
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-05-24 14:50:25 UTC (1684939825558) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-05-31 02:39:52 UTC (1685500792003) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-05-24 17:29:56 -0500 | Rating Details |