Birdwatch Note
2023-05-24 02:28:29 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Calling it an “advertising campaign” is misleading. Bud Light wasn’t using Dylan Mulvaney in a campaign. The company created a personalized Bud Light can for Mulvaney, which she shared on social media as a product endorsement. https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Business/boycott-bud-light-hammering-sales-experts-explain/story?id=99505649
Written by 3ABED1E4BE81109A1EC46DE9BB9C32DC4919FE9E1DD7B3F797B3E347A9A80F93
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1661038049822646276
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1661197445043302402
- noteId - 1661197445043302402
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 3ABED1E4BE81109A1EC46DE9BB9C32DC4919FE9E1DD7B3F797B3E347A9A80F93 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1684895309112
- tweetId - 1661038049822646276
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Calling it an “advertising campaign” is misleading. Bud Light wasn’t using Dylan Mulvaney in a campaign. The company created a personalized Bud Light can for Mulvaney, which she shared on social media as a product endorsement. https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Business/boycott-bud-light-hammering-sales-experts-explain/story?id=99505649
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-05-24 02:28:29 UTC (1684895309112) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-05-31 02:39:52 UTC (1685500792003) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-05-24 02:17:45 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-24 03:32:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-23 21:36:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-24 04:41:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-23 23:30:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-24 04:10:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-23 21:33:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-24 02:19:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-23 21:52:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-24 04:05:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-24 02:58:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-23 21:32:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-24 03:56:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-23 22:52:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-24 03:07:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-24 03:31:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-24 03:53:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-24 02:27:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-24 03:35:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-24 04:06:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-23 21:36:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-24 03:11:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-23 22:33:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-24 03:57:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-23 23:03:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-24 02:27:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-24 13:35:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-24 02:47:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-24 04:03:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-24 04:25:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-24 03:09:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-23 22:17:27 -0500 | Rating Details |