Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-05-22 17:47:02 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

If you read past the initial headline in the original article, it goes on to state that only 10 “top” smartphones were tested, however the 10 android and iOS smartphones tested are generally over 3 years old excluding chinese brand android phones. The S10+ was released in 2019 https://t.co/bOK6GOUDKF

Written by 50E4379D67447B2153DCF5C937EABDC6DF8970C51AB77C1FE251645715FC70A7
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1660674140796248064

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1660703830663634963
  • noteId - 1660703830663634963
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 50E4379D67447B2153DCF5C937EABDC6DF8970C51AB77C1FE251645715FC70A7 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1684777622271
  • tweetId - 1660674140796248064
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • If you read past the initial headline in the original article, it goes on to state that only 10 “top” smartphones were tested, however the 10 android and iOS smartphones tested are generally over 3 years old excluding chinese brand android phones. The S10+ was released in 2019 https://t.co/bOK6GOUDKF

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-05-22 17:47:02 UTC
(1684777622271)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-05-31 02:39:52 UTC
(1685500792003)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-05-22 17:26:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-22 18:57:36 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-22 18:29:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-22 14:11:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-22 18:03:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-22 17:42:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-22 17:30:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-22 19:06:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-22 12:56:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-22 17:28:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-22 18:38:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-22 19:15:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-22 18:10:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-22 18:40:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-22 17:46:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-22 18:53:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-22 19:46:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-22 20:20:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-22 19:56:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-22 19:32:33 -0500 Rating Details