Birdwatch Note
2023-05-22 17:16:36 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The testimony of two women who have testified that they were working for Andrew Tate willingly have been ignored by the judge presiding over the case. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11706801/Two-women-insisted-worked-Andrew-Tate-brainwashed-Romanian-judges-rule.html
Written by 12B422125E9668D1F48191E8AA2D30807E44A823FDB790897916E577EC49C80E
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1660608980261937152
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1660696172036538389
- noteId - 1660696172036538389
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 12B422125E9668D1F48191E8AA2D30807E44A823FDB790897916E577EC49C80E Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1684775796315
- tweetId - 1660608980261937152
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The testimony of two women who have testified that they were working for Andrew Tate willingly have been ignored by the judge presiding over the case. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11706801/Two-women-insisted-worked-Andrew-Tate-brainwashed-Romanian-judges-rule.html
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-05-22 17:16:36 UTC (1684775796315) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-05-31 02:39:52 UTC (1685500792003) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-05-22 13:11:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-22 13:01:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-22 12:42:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-22 15:02:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-22 12:20:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-22 13:32:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-22 12:46:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-22 15:04:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-22 13:58:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-22 12:20:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-22 14:26:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-22 18:40:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-22 12:48:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-23 11:55:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-22 23:51:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-23 00:41:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-22 23:41:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-23 03:56:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-10 22:59:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-10 22:59:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-10 22:59:14 -0500 | Rating Details |