Birdwatch Note
2023-05-22 11:51:32 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Personal opinion. NNN. Legal scholars have strongly argued that SCOTUS should find the use of Espionage Act(under which Assange is charged) overbroad and unconstitutional in the absence of a public interest defense: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/may/30/daniel-ellsberg-snowden-fair-trial-kerry-espionage-act https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP05C01629R000200460004-2.pdf https://sgp.fas.org/library/edgar.pdf https://theintercept.com/2018/11/16/as-the-obama-doj-concluded-prosecution-of-julian-assange-for-publishing-documents-poses-grave-threats-to-press-freedom/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufRpvfeUkak Assange rape investigation was dropped in 2019: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50473792
Written by 4E5743C652F3801F461FE559BEEE741F7F016098F206E963AA11A47F6BFE437F
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1660385696270483461
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1660614366847279108
- noteId - 1660614366847279108
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 4E5743C652F3801F461FE559BEEE741F7F016098F206E963AA11A47F6BFE437F Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1684756292436
- tweetId - 1660385696270483461
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Personal opinion. NNN. Legal scholars have strongly argued that SCOTUS should find the use of Espionage Act(under which Assange is charged) overbroad and unconstitutional in the absence of a public interest defense: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/may/30/daniel-ellsberg-snowden-fair-trial-kerry-espionage-act https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP05C01629R000200460004-2.pdf https://sgp.fas.org/library/edgar.pdf https://theintercept.com/2018/11/16/as-the-obama-doj-concluded-prosecution-of-julian-assange-for-publishing-documents-poses-grave-threats-to-press-freedom/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufRpvfeUkak Assange rape investigation was dropped in 2019: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-50473792
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-05-22 11:51:32 UTC (1684756292436) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-05-31 02:39:52 UTC (1685500792003) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-05-22 07:37:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-22 11:08:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-22 07:05:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-22 09:17:04 -0500 | Rating Details |