Birdwatch Note
2023-05-21 17:33:09 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
There are many articles written about Google censorship. Reliable news means censorship-free, a free flow of information, thoughts, and ideas regardless of ideology. Find a censorship-free search engine & research googles claim. Here are a few articles: https://www.businessinsider.com/google-researcher-resigns-in-protest-over-possible-censored-search-engine-china-2018-9 https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2022/03/04/google-has-been-russia-most-compliant-us-tech-censor-will-that-change-with-ukraine/ https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/10/31/five-times-google-was-caught-red-handed-on-bias-and-censorship/ https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2016-06-22/google-is-the-worlds-biggest-censor-and-its-power-must-be-regulated https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/15/google-tweaks-its-algorithm-to-change-search-results-wsj.html https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/science/articles/coronavirus-google-censorship-danger https://www.wsj.com/articles/dont-let-google-get-away-with-censorship-11565132175 https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2010/jan/13/how-google-censors-china https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/27/technology/eu-google-fine.html
Written by 95AF44DE4CB59B3762B7DDDC12CD473B9EF4A97F48ABF0F6030FE01E8772636A
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1651540654856577024
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1660337949001814016
- noteId - 1660337949001814016
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 95AF44DE4CB59B3762B7DDDC12CD473B9EF4A97F48ABF0F6030FE01E8772636A Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1684690389287
- tweetId - 1651540654856577024
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- There are many articles written about Google censorship. Reliable news means censorship-free, a free flow of information, thoughts, and ideas regardless of ideology. Find a censorship-free search engine & research googles claim. Here are a few articles: https://www.businessinsider.com/google-researcher-resigns-in-protest-over-possible-censored-search-engine-china-2018-9 https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2022/03/04/google-has-been-russia-most-compliant-us-tech-censor-will-that-change-with-ukraine/ https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/10/31/five-times-google-was-caught-red-handed-on-bias-and-censorship/ https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2016-06-22/google-is-the-worlds-biggest-censor-and-its-power-must-be-regulated https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/15/google-tweaks-its-algorithm-to-change-search-results-wsj.html https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/science/articles/coronavirus-google-censorship-danger https://www.wsj.com/articles/dont-let-google-get-away-with-censorship-11565132175 https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2010/jan/13/how-google-censors-china https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/27/technology/eu-google-fine.html
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-05-21 17:33:09 UTC (1684690389287) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-05-31 02:39:52 UTC (1685500792003) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-05-22 03:20:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-23 17:10:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-23 06:20:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-23 15:29:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-23 19:05:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-24 09:10:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-24 15:28:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-24 11:51:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-25 06:46:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-25 12:01:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-25 07:40:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-26 14:32:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-29 21:36:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-29 08:13:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-29 08:08:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-28 08:23:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-28 06:57:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-27 10:47:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-27 06:57:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-27 02:13:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-30 21:13:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-01 11:32:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-01 03:08:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-01 01:01:55 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-31 20:31:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-04 18:37:36 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-05 17:46:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-05 16:16:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-07 18:52:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-09 05:20:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-10 07:45:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-11 16:11:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-11 01:28:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-12 03:56:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-11 21:03:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-14 10:59:19 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-14 08:15:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-15 15:42:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-15 13:35:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-06-15 10:32:21 -0500 | Rating Details |