Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-05-21 04:06:26 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Notes on this tweet incorrectly cite an old article, yet law enforcement investigations found the victim did not recant the allegations https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/justice-department-closes-inquiry-murder-emmett-finds-no-proof-accuser-rcna7806 As you can see, all the notes are wrong and this recent 2021 article clearly states no allegations were recant Nnn

Written by 5E02EA0A45265FF764ED40C9B3B6D23927583F95803781ABDB685C167FF851F6
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1659719972677906432

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1660134930922237954
  • noteId - 1660134930922237954
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 5E02EA0A45265FF764ED40C9B3B6D23927583F95803781ABDB685C167FF851F6 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1684641986004
  • tweetId - 1659719972677906432
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Notes on this tweet incorrectly cite an old article, yet law enforcement investigations found the victim did not recant the allegations https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/justice-department-closes-inquiry-murder-emmett-finds-no-proof-accuser-rcna7806 As you can see, all the notes are wrong and this recent 2021 article clearly states no allegations were recant Nnn

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-05-21 04:06:26 UTC
(1684641986004)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-05-31 02:39:52 UTC
(1685500792003)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-05-21 12:04:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-21 01:20:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-21 08:29:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-21 10:27:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-21 02:00:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-21 03:24:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-21 00:00:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-20 23:24:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-21 01:04:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-21 07:03:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-21 11:34:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-21 05:13:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-21 03:42:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-21 11:12:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-20 23:10:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-21 09:58:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-20 23:40:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-21 00:19:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-21 03:42:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-21 01:49:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-21 00:37:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-20 23:16:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-21 01:17:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-20 23:13:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-21 02:07:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-22 17:47:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-22 09:57:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-23 11:37:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-23 23:06:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-24 06:41:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-24 17:22:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-24 06:24:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-23 19:57:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-24 12:44:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-23 20:04:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-28 01:08:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-04 22:09:22 -0500 Rating Details