Birdwatch Note
2023-05-19 19:58:25 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
https://englishcomposition.org/hard-as-hail-vs-hard-as-hell-which-is-correct-meaning-and-examples-of-this-common-english-phrase/ They are closely related in meaning. They can understand what is meant by both uses. Hell is hard and hail is hard. Seems to be a matter of personal preference. Not a rule written in stone..which is also hard.
Written by BD1C78A320F0878CB1FD2E007A321176835CBCDD46CAED348344976AC8E8D9BB
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1659629974611951617
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1659649732522680326
- noteId - 1659649732522680326
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - BD1C78A320F0878CB1FD2E007A321176835CBCDD46CAED348344976AC8E8D9BB Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1684526305692
- tweetId - 1659629974611951617
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- https://englishcomposition.org/hard-as-hail-vs-hard-as-hell-which-is-correct-meaning-and-examples-of-this-common-english-phrase/ They are closely related in meaning. They can understand what is meant by both uses. Hell is hard and hail is hard. Seems to be a matter of personal preference. Not a rule written in stone..which is also hard.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-05-19 19:58:25 UTC (1684526305692) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-05-20 02:39:09 UTC (1684550349297) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
|||
| 2023-05-19 19:58:25 UTC (1684526305692) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-05-31 02:39:52 UTC (1685500792003) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-05-19 17:40:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-19 16:57:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-20 19:25:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-19 20:04:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-19 19:41:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-20 19:25:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-19 16:57:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-19 17:40:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-19 20:04:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-21 01:29:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-20 21:47:56 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-19 19:41:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-22 08:23:29 -0500 | Rating Details |