Birdwatch Note
2023-05-18 11:05:41 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
While an American court found that Amber Heard had defamed Johnny Depp by making abuse allegations, the allegations were upheld (in a separate case brought against a newspaper) in the English and Welsh Court of Appeals. Poster is in the UK where the latter order applies.
Written by 2B46B9BF8D9BE8E7FDC2170AF89D6EDE426E78E20CB4BA8F58E56562E4A696C0
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1657747939580575744
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1659153278708625408
- noteId - 1659153278708625408
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 2B46B9BF8D9BE8E7FDC2170AF89D6EDE426E78E20CB4BA8F58E56562E4A696C0 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1684407941879
- tweetId - 1657747939580575744
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- While an American court found that Amber Heard had defamed Johnny Depp by making abuse allegations, the allegations were upheld (in a separate case brought against a newspaper) in the English and Welsh Court of Appeals. Poster is in the UK where the latter order applies.
Note Status History
createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
2023-05-18 11:05:41 UTC (1684407941879) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-05-19 02:11:50 UTC (1684462310344) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
|||
2023-05-18 11:05:41 UTC (1684407941879) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-05-31 02:39:52 UTC (1685500792003) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2023-05-18 13:30:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-18 11:51:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-18 10:45:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-18 09:59:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-18 09:46:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-18 09:39:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-18 09:36:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-18 09:13:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-18 07:28:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-18 07:23:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-20 00:30:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-18 09:39:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-18 09:13:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-18 09:36:33 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-18 13:30:46 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-18 10:45:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-20 00:30:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-21 13:37:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-18 09:46:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-18 09:59:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-18 07:28:22 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-18 07:23:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-18 11:51:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-27 11:58:20 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-27 06:24:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-27 06:19:24 -0500 | Rating Details | |
2023-05-27 05:56:49 -0500 | Rating Details |