Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-05-17 19:29:09 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

No Note Needed. This is nitpicking on symantics. Technically default is the wrong word which should be repudiate. However past defaults were accidental or related to disputes over payments; not because Congress would not uphold it's duties. https://www.axios.com/2023/05/16/us-history-debt-default

Written by A00DB40E73258521C2F1A181C266976CEC566580B45111856674F26B905DF2B8
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1658853400333647873

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1658917591660855297
  • noteId - 1658917591660855297
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - A00DB40E73258521C2F1A181C266976CEC566580B45111856674F26B905DF2B8 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1684351749708
  • tweetId - 1658853400333647873
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • No Note Needed. This is nitpicking on symantics. Technically default is the wrong word which should be repudiate. However past defaults were accidental or related to disputes over payments; not because Congress would not uphold it's duties. https://www.axios.com/2023/05/16/us-history-debt-default

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-05-17 19:29:09 UTC
(1684351749708)		 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)		 2023-05-18 02:13:34 UTC
(1684376014425)		 NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-05-17 19:29:09 UTC
(1684351749708)		 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)		 2023-05-31 02:39:52 UTC
(1685500792003)		 NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-05-17 19:24:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-17 16:45:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-17 16:14:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-17 16:09:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-17 15:39:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-17 15:32:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-17 15:09:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-17 14:59:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-18 06:05:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-18 05:46:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-17 22:15:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-17 21:32:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-17 21:08:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-17 20:30:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-20 13:27:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-17 15:39:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-17 15:09:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-17 16:14:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-17 21:32:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-17 14:59:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-17 20:30:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-17 16:45:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-21 00:52:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-17 15:32:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-17 21:08:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-17 22:15:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-18 05:46:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-18 06:05:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-17 19:24:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-20 13:27:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-17 16:09:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-29 11:22:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-27 19:15:51 -0500 Rating Details