Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-05-15 20:09:17 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Mentira, la foto no muestra un hongo nuclear. Se necesita más de un 90% de U-235 para conseguir una explosión nuclear y el uranio empobrecido tiene una proporción menor del 0,7%. El uranio empobrecido se utiliza en proyectiles por su enorme masa, no por su toxicidad, que es baja.

Written by 981A49207990D0855A997D347AE480C3FBD5CAA5A86684E92B887C52B48368E7
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1658101171343568896

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1658202913825497088
  • noteId - 1658202913825497088
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 981A49207990D0855A997D347AE480C3FBD5CAA5A86684E92B887C52B48368E7 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1684181357235
  • tweetId - 1658101171343568896
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • Mentira, la foto no muestra un hongo nuclear. Se necesita más de un 90% de U-235 para conseguir una explosión nuclear y el uranio empobrecido tiene una proporción menor del 0,7%. El uranio empobrecido se utiliza en proyectiles por su enorme masa, no por su toxicidad, que es baja.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-05-15 20:09:17 UTC
(1684181357235)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-05-16 02:14:27 UTC
(1684203267213)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-05-15 20:09:17 UTC
(1684181357235)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-05-31 02:39:52 UTC
(1685500792003)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-05-15 16:53:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 16:33:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 16:26:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 16:21:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 15:52:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 15:40:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 15:39:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 15:37:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 15:36:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 15:25:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 15:22:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 15:20:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 15:20:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 15:19:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 15:13:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 15:10:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-16 02:23:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-16 00:58:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 15:37:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 15:20:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 15:25:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 15:22:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 15:40:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 16:33:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 15:10:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 15:19:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 15:13:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 15:20:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 15:39:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-16 00:58:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 15:36:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 15:52:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 16:53:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-16 02:23:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 16:21:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 16:26:58 -0500 Rating Details