Birdwatch Note
2023-05-11 00:46:21 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
While this ad does not need a note, other ads might. Just because it's a promoted tweet doesn't mean it can't be false or misleading.
Written by 0CEF6A986B2BE12187CDBF1ADC5F6D164738D14C8135E7E32361633D7FBD64BA
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1652029802142900227
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1656460701135691779
- noteId - 1656460701135691779
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 0CEF6A986B2BE12187CDBF1ADC5F6D164738D14C8135E7E32361633D7FBD64BA Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1683765981359
- tweetId - 1652029802142900227
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- While this ad does not need a note, other ads might. Just because it's a promoted tweet doesn't mean it can't be false or misleading.
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-05-11 00:46:21 UTC (1683765981359) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-05-11 02:41:21 UTC (1683772881623) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |