Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-05-10 15:41:02 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The tweeted article (https://www.cbc.ca/news/editorsblog/cbc-news-press-freedom-2023-1.6834223) includes a breakdown of CBC's funding, including that it recieved over $1.2 billion in federal funding in 2021-22. Due to this, the note saying that the article is misleading because it does not include that info is not needed.

Written by 41934BF46C7224EBD913124DC637D49A186717953392A0D0827FDCC68B6A92DF
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1655997560597643289

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1656323468844224518
  • noteId - 1656323468844224518
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 41934BF46C7224EBD913124DC637D49A186717953392A0D0827FDCC68B6A92DF Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1683733262632
  • tweetId - 1655997560597643289
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The tweeted article (https://www.cbc.ca/news/editorsblog/cbc-news-press-freedom-2023-1.6834223) includes a breakdown of CBC's funding, including that it recieved over $1.2 billion in federal funding in 2021-22. Due to this, the note saying that the article is misleading because it does not include that info is not needed.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-05-10 15:41:02 UTC
(1683733262632)		 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)		 2023-05-11 02:41:21 UTC
(1683772881623)		 NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-05-10 18:55:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 18:03:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 17:21:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 12:53:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 10:58:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 10:56:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 10:45:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 22:07:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 21:38:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 19:42:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 17:24:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-14 19:48:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-16 06:03:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-16 01:54:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-16 00:07:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-17 17:24:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-17 15:09:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 17:21:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 10:45:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-15 17:24:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-17 15:09:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-17 17:24:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 18:03:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 19:42:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 12:53:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 18:55:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 10:56:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-16 06:03:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 10:58:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 21:38:03 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-16 01:54:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-16 00:07:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-14 19:48:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-10 22:07:21 -0500 Rating Details