Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-05-09 18:29:39 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

What CS fail to mention is how you measured time in those days in that case. You didn't, but people did keep close track on which day of the year the sun was at its highest point, so if the day was the same you'd find that N/S of such a place, the obelix would cast a shadow.

Written by 1F9717A9D71E6A040BDEBBAA43C7037823CABE66892F8E83F83826D753933DB9
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1655594949839147009

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1656003513028100096
  • noteId - 1656003513028100096
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 1F9717A9D71E6A040BDEBBAA43C7037823CABE66892F8E83F83826D753933DB9 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1683656979221
  • tweetId - 1655594949839147009
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 1
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • What CS fail to mention is how you measured time in those days in that case. You didn't, but people did keep close track on which day of the year the sun was at its highest point, so if the day was the same you'd find that N/S of such a place, the obelix would cast a shadow.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-05-09 18:29:39 UTC
(1683656979221)
2023-05-10 01:42:48 UTC
(1683682968247)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-05-10 02:41:33 UTC
(1683686493070)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 2023-05-10 01:42:48 UTC
(1683682968247)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-05-09 14:01:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-09 13:40:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-09 13:36:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-09 13:34:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-09 13:33:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-09 13:31:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-09 13:36:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-09 13:40:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-09 13:31:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-09 13:33:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-09 14:01:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-09 13:34:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-15 11:23:21 -0500 Rating Details
2024-01-06 17:47:38 -0600 Rating Details