Birdwatch Note
2023-05-06 19:15:45 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Claims of breakthroughs in Earthquake prediction research have failed to withstand scrutiny. Extensive searches have failed to find reliable precursors. https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/131/3/425/2138719 "…specific earthquakes cannot be predicted." https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4873 https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/230/1/50/6522179 https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/ssa/bssa/article-abstract/3/4/187/115298/The-so-called-luminous-phenomena-of-earthquakes https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2012/may/30/attempts-predict-earthquakes-harm-good http://www.geo.mtu.edu/UPSeis/waves.html https://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/topics/animal_eqs.php https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-you-predict-earthquakes
Written by AFC5C07D009FE4C54C28253564AB95C4ACD4F3E1BB017002587865A55AE6ACDE
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1654079657967222786
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1654927952558301184
- noteId - 1654927952558301184
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - AFC5C07D009FE4C54C28253564AB95C4ACD4F3E1BB017002587865A55AE6ACDE Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1683400545622
- tweetId - 1654079657967222786
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Claims of breakthroughs in Earthquake prediction research have failed to withstand scrutiny. Extensive searches have failed to find reliable precursors. https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/131/3/425/2138719 "…specific earthquakes cannot be predicted." https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4873 https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/230/1/50/6522179 https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/ssa/bssa/article-abstract/3/4/187/115298/The-so-called-luminous-phenomena-of-earthquakes https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2012/may/30/attempts-predict-earthquakes-harm-good http://www.geo.mtu.edu/UPSeis/waves.html https://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/topics/animal_eqs.php https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/can-you-predict-earthquakes
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-05-06 19:15:45 UTC (1683400545622) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-05-08 02:40:01 UTC (1683513601329) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-05-07 01:49:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-06 16:06:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-06 15:09:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-06 15:09:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-07 01:49:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-06 16:06:54 -0500 | Rating Details |