Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-05-05 06:27:37 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The AZ Supreme Court called the $2000 penalty “ a sanction” for “false factual statements to the Court.” The Court Order stated Lake “has repeatedly” made the false assertion. “statements” & “repeatedly” both show this tweet’s “1 sentence” assertion incorrect. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23798417-decisionorder-4768116-0 https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/arizona/2023/05/04/ariz-supreme-court-hits-lake-attorney-with-sanctions-on-election-suit/70177506007/

Written by ABFABF35DCC9FFD9D40838EF225EF906EE24B11F422C8DEFF35BCF2EB6DECE3B
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1654231425783336960

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1654372256779317248
  • noteId - 1654372256779317248
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - ABFABF35DCC9FFD9D40838EF225EF906EE24B11F422C8DEFF35BCF2EB6DECE3B Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1683268057425
  • tweetId - 1654231425783336960
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The AZ Supreme Court called the $2000 penalty “ a sanction” for “false factual statements to the Court.” The Court Order stated Lake “has repeatedly” made the false assertion. “statements” & “repeatedly” both show this tweet’s “1 sentence” assertion incorrect. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23798417-decisionorder-4768116-0 https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/arizona/2023/05/04/ariz-supreme-court-hits-lake-attorney-with-sanctions-on-election-suit/70177506007/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-05-05 06:27:37 UTC
(1683268057425)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-05-06 02:42:24 UTC
(1683340944665)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-05-05 15:29:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-05 14:37:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-05 07:57:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-05 07:51:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-05 05:58:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-05 02:53:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-05 01:50:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-05 01:37:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-06 07:27:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-05 07:57:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-05 14:37:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-06 07:27:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-05 01:50:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-05 01:37:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-05 07:51:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-05 02:53:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-05 15:29:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-05 05:58:31 -0500 Rating Details