Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-05-05 04:07:38 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Kari is not getting fined for claiming 35k ballots were inserted, but rather she is getting fined for saying it's an undisputed fact they were. However, the AZ Supreme Court has ruled that Kari did not have enough evidence to establish the ballot inserting claim in court. https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/arizona/2023/05/04/ariz-supreme-court-hits-lake-attorney-with-sanctions-on-election-suit/70177506007/

Written by 2DE6F83F64F279E7E8DE6BDAC9F82A9F16DBA6BA9148B46F59AE84F2048E50F4
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1654224807322619904

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1654337029147172864
  • noteId - 1654337029147172864
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 2DE6F83F64F279E7E8DE6BDAC9F82A9F16DBA6BA9148B46F59AE84F2048E50F4 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1683259658504
  • tweetId - 1654224807322619904
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Kari is not getting fined for claiming 35k ballots were inserted, but rather she is getting fined for saying it's an undisputed fact they were. However, the AZ Supreme Court has ruled that Kari did not have enough evidence to establish the ballot inserting claim in court. https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/arizona/2023/05/04/ariz-supreme-court-hits-lake-attorney-with-sanctions-on-election-suit/70177506007/

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-05-05 04:07:38 UTC
(1683259658504)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-05-06 02:42:24 UTC
(1683340944665)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-05-05 12:22:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-05 10:11:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-05 09:18:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-05 03:00:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-05 02:57:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-04 23:14:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-04 23:12:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-06 07:28:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-19 17:59:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-19 17:00:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-06 07:28:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-05 12:22:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-05 09:18:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-05 02:57:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-04 23:12:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-19 17:00:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-19 17:59:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-05 03:00:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-04 23:14:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-05 10:11:18 -0500 Rating Details