Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-05-04 18:23:06 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

For context, Justice Thomas faces criticism for failing to comply with ethical and legal rules requiring the disclosure of financial conflicts, not merely for failing to recuse himself from a case. Justice Sotomayor made the required disclosures. See, e.g., https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Sotomayor-S-J3.-SC_SR_21.pdf.

Written by 45060ED935D102E05C21C743FE433C0B17B27D8FCF69CED01A2AD3F9AB2815B1
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1654070925048856578

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1654189924801736706
  • noteId - 1654189924801736706
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 45060ED935D102E05C21C743FE433C0B17B27D8FCF69CED01A2AD3F9AB2815B1 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1683224586090
  • tweetId - 1654070925048856578
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • For context, Justice Thomas faces criticism for failing to comply with ethical and legal rules requiring the disclosure of financial conflicts, not merely for failing to recuse himself from a case. Justice Sotomayor made the required disclosures. See, e.g., https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Sotomayor-S-J3.-SC_SR_21.pdf.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-05-04 18:23:06 UTC
(1683224586090)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-05-06 02:42:24 UTC
(1683340944665)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-05-04 16:58:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-04 15:41:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-04 15:01:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-04 14:38:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-04 14:12:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-04 13:58:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-04 13:53:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-04 13:51:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-04 13:49:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-04 13:39:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-04 13:25:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-04 13:51:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-04 16:58:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-04 13:49:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-04 13:53:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-04 13:39:43 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-04 13:25:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-04 14:38:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-04 15:01:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-04 13:58:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-04 14:12:33 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-04 15:41:01 -0500 Rating Details