Birdwatch Note
2023-05-03 20:49:09 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This image appears many times in social media but its authenticity is debatable. A good thread explaining this (not peer reviewed) appears on Twitter: https://twitter.com/fakehistoryhunt/status/1283147067754512384 An academically reviewed article on the limits of ancient dentistry can be found here. https://www.nature.com/articles/sj.bdj.2009.355
Written by DCA4F048ED1DEBA07E0B623C8525FA2C5F6A1064CFED103165C08B8CF5842F77
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1653789619119423488
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1653864291236290561
- noteId - 1653864291236290561
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - DCA4F048ED1DEBA07E0B623C8525FA2C5F6A1064CFED103165C08B8CF5842F77 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1683146949002
- tweetId - 1653789619119423488
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 1
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This image appears many times in social media but its authenticity is debatable. A good thread explaining this (not peer reviewed) appears on Twitter: https://twitter.com/fakehistoryhunt/status/1283147067754512384 An academically reviewed article on the limits of ancient dentistry can be found here. https://www.nature.com/articles/sj.bdj.2009.355
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-05-03 20:49:09 UTC (1683146949002) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-05-06 02:42:24 UTC (1683340944665) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-05-04 14:45:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-04 09:55:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-04 07:24:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-04 05:42:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-04 04:39:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-04 03:58:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-04 02:35:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 23:23:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 19:54:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 18:39:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 17:40:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 17:11:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 17:05:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 16:21:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 16:15:00 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-04 07:24:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 16:21:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 23:23:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 19:54:51 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 17:40:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-04 03:58:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 17:11:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-04 09:55:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-04 02:35:29 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 17:05:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-04 05:42:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 18:39:57 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-04 04:39:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-04 14:45:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 16:15:00 -0500 | Rating Details |