Birdwatch Note
2023-05-03 17:53:17 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Suggested note is incorrect. The Supreme Court is not *legally bound* by any code of ethics--passage of a law would be new. Just because they say they voluntarily adhere to that (despite ample reporting to the contrary) does not make it true. No note necessary, not misleading. https://www.americanbar.org/advocacy/governmental_legislative_work/publications/washingtonletter/feb-23-wl/scotus-ethics-0223wl/
Written by 648BE6EE6413CB1DE7ED8A8A5637E417455500360B820CE820E3A4FD4EC19130
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1653754773907046402
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1653820034752430081
- noteId - 1653820034752430081
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 648BE6EE6413CB1DE7ED8A8A5637E417455500360B820CE820E3A4FD4EC19130 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1683136397432
- tweetId - 1653754773907046402
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Suggested note is incorrect. The Supreme Court is not *legally bound* by any code of ethics--passage of a law would be new. Just because they say they voluntarily adhere to that (despite ample reporting to the contrary) does not make it true. No note necessary, not misleading. https://www.americanbar.org/advocacy/governmental_legislative_work/publications/washingtonletter/feb-23-wl/scotus-ethics-0223wl/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-05-03 17:53:17 UTC (1683136397432) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-05-06 02:42:24 UTC (1683340944665) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-05-04 06:39:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 23:51:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 21:08:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 20:57:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 19:12:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 18:14:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 16:18:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 14:16:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 13:14:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 19:12:58 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 21:08:39 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 13:14:03 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 20:57:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 14:16:25 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 23:51:14 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 18:14:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 16:18:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-04 06:39:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-05 11:34:51 -0500 | Rating Details |