Birdwatch Note
2023-05-03 13:33:12 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The Supreme Court, in response to recent criticism of the justices’ ethical practices, unanimously agreed that there was no problem with either the justices’ travel and private business transactions. Every Justice agreed. https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-ethics-clarence-thomas-2f3fbc26a4d8fe45c82269127458fa08
Written by C378931E048482D2BFDF00DC95644D6377CBCB812C79FF87D77B5E48595B3DA3
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1652349374356127745
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1653754583196246020
- noteId - 1653754583196246020
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - C378931E048482D2BFDF00DC95644D6377CBCB812C79FF87D77B5E48595B3DA3 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1683120792563
- tweetId - 1652349374356127745
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The Supreme Court, in response to recent criticism of the justices’ ethical practices, unanimously agreed that there was no problem with either the justices’ travel and private business transactions. Every Justice agreed. https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-ethics-clarence-thomas-2f3fbc26a4d8fe45c82269127458fa08
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-05-03 13:33:12 UTC (1683120792563) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-05-06 02:42:24 UTC (1683340944665) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-05-03 11:04:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 10:57:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 09:45:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 09:36:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 09:28:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 09:24:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 08:50:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 09:24:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 11:04:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 08:50:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 10:57:53 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 09:45:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 09:28:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-03 09:36:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-07-07 10:23:46 -0500 | Rating Details |