Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-05-03 00:21:49 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

O projeto de lei 2630 não visa censura, e sim responsabilizar civilmente as empresas por circulação de conteúdo criminoso quando esse for impulsionado por publicidade ou quando a empresa falhar em conter a disseminação desse conteúdo. Entenda melhor em: https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/articles/cyeyxje7r9go

Written by 5C30364F1F0604500D87521F3CE39C60142C759FD482929E149195A5ECDD6A4D
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1653437154867961856

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1653555426699386885
  • noteId - 1653555426699386885
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 5C30364F1F0604500D87521F3CE39C60142C759FD482929E149195A5ECDD6A4D Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1683073309953
  • tweetId - 1653437154867961856
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • O projeto de lei 2630 não visa censura, e sim responsabilizar civilmente as empresas por circulação de conteúdo criminoso quando esse for impulsionado por publicidade ou quando a empresa falhar em conter a disseminação desse conteúdo. Entenda melhor em: https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/articles/cyeyxje7r9go

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-05-03 00:21:49 UTC
(1683073309953)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-05-06 02:42:24 UTC
(1683340944665)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-05-03 09:00:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-03 06:57:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-03 05:39:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-03 04:33:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-03 04:25:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-03 02:53:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-03 02:32:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 21:48:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 21:25:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 21:23:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 21:06:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 20:54:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 20:31:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 19:28:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-03 04:25:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-03 09:00:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-03 04:33:49 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 20:54:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 19:28:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-03 05:39:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 21:06:42 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 21:48:01 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-03 02:53:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-03 06:57:52 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 20:31:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-03 02:32:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 21:25:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-05-02 21:23:30 -0500 Rating Details