Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-04-30 17:56:16 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The tweet appears to be misinformation; a launcher of some sort, speculated to be an RPO-1, is visible, as are several rounds of ammunition for it. Individual was an armed combatant. https://twitter.com/revishvilig/status/1652429860982194182?s=46&t=HNxzsQR8olgBzWS2fMye0Q Unlikely a single artillery round was that accurate; likely struck a mine or similar munition.

Written by 648BE6EE6413CB1DE7ED8A8A5637E417455500360B820CE820E3A4FD4EC19130
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1652445555237306370

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1652733622984536070
  • noteId - 1652733622984536070
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 648BE6EE6413CB1DE7ED8A8A5637E417455500360B820CE820E3A4FD4EC19130 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1682877376681
  • tweetId - 1652445555237306370
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The tweet appears to be misinformation; a launcher of some sort, speculated to be an RPO-1, is visible, as are several rounds of ammunition for it. Individual was an armed combatant. https://twitter.com/revishvilig/status/1652429860982194182?s=46&t=HNxzsQR8olgBzWS2fMye0Q Unlikely a single artillery round was that accurate; likely struck a mine or similar munition.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-04-30 17:56:16 UTC
(1682877376681)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-05-06 02:42:24 UTC
(1683340944665)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-04-30 20:49:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-30 16:38:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-30 15:27:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-30 14:33:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-30 13:44:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-30 13:21:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-30 13:04:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-30 20:49:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-30 13:21:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-30 13:44:32 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-30 16:38:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-30 15:27:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-30 14:33:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-30 13:04:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-05 11:50:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-06-14 05:59:05 -0500 Rating Details