Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-04-30 05:50:00 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The article is correct and focuses on what Fauci didn't say, rather than debating the effectiveness of masks themselves. A linked study in a note omits conclusion: “high risk of bias...variation in outcome measurement…low adherence" hinders firm conclusions countering Fauci. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/web/cochrane/content?templateType=full&urlTitle=/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6&doi=10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6&type=cdsr&contentLanguage=&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

Written by 7A6949B2D3D3AB4D3A224EF03952479104A809CBC429304B6987C3A590F9DB5F
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1651383186725785600

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1652550853205606400
  • noteId - 1652550853205606400
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 7A6949B2D3D3AB4D3A224EF03952479104A809CBC429304B6987C3A590F9DB5F Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1682833800973
  • tweetId - 1651383186725785600
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The article is correct and focuses on what Fauci didn't say, rather than debating the effectiveness of masks themselves. A linked study in a note omits conclusion: “high risk of bias...variation in outcome measurement…low adherence" hinders firm conclusions countering Fauci. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/web/cochrane/content?templateType=full&urlTitle=/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6&doi=10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6&type=cdsr&contentLanguage=&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-04-30 05:50:00 UTC
(1682833800973)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-05-06 02:42:24 UTC
(1683340944665)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-04-30 07:19:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-30 01:19:17 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-30 01:08:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-30 01:08:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-30 07:19:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-04-30 01:19:17 -0500 Rating Details